🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's youth". The policy could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented a leading MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust evidence".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content argues that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the local level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this global conversation unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments internationally are no longer prepared to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.