🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for playing excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then discard him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.